|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

harry beanbag
Caldari Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.08 14:28:00 -
[1]
Edited by: harry beanbag on 08/12/2008 14:30:39 removing logistics and jump bridges and such are not the answer. All that would do is maybe delay the blob by a day or 2.
Honestly i think its the high end moons. i say make them more available in emipre and lowsec, crash the market for dyps and prom and you'll see a less need for the super blob. CCP stated they want people to move out of empire and play in 00 but without the income generated by the people already holding space, you cant match them in a long scale engagement. Its too easy for people already holding territory to replace their losses which also makes them that much more harder to remove.
edit: i agree with the poster above me about adding more NPC 00 regions. I think that would deffinitly help the younger new to 00 alliances make a spot for themselves in eve.
|

harry beanbag
Caldari Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.08 20:56:00 -
[2]
Shouldnt there be some CSM's up in this thread giving us their ideas. Isnt it kinda their job?
|

harry beanbag
Caldari Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.09 21:03:00 -
[3]
1. Removale of the local window will cause an increase of metagamming. Without the means to acuratly obtain intel on hostile forces, the player base will move more into alliance infiltration and personal website hacking. You would get far greater info inside the enemy gang then trying to guese how many ships on the scanner are actualy piloted.
2. Remove the ability of jump bridges to link into other regions. I like graalums idea of haveing them get better range but can only link between sov 4's inside the region. I also think titans should be forced to jump through with the stuff they open the portal for.
3. High end moons are the real problem with eve. This is probably the 1 single reason alliances do so much of a land grab and take space they will never use. The reward for holding such high ends is too much. I say crash the market. Either introduce a ton of new high end moons in empire or lowsec, make them run out after say a months time of mining, have hauler spawns in missions and npc rat's drop them, and/or make it that you have to manualy mine the moon with a ship of some sort. The number one motivation for human beings is greed and that is extremly evident here in eve. People would rather be rich ingame than have fun ingame.
4. Introduction of more NPC 00 space. This is a must. It will allow more of the player base to leave empire without joining in some giant nap fest. It will allow more players more freedom and mobility to do what they want to do. They wont have to be concerned with pos warfare anymore if they choose too. I would expect a number of new regions to be introduced and expansion of existing areas.
5. New ships or new tech need to be given to the playerbase to combat the capital blob. there needs to be some sort of reward for not having 500 people to fight 100. Some say this is a diplomatic issue but i believe its a game tech issue. My suggestion: when a players ship explodes, it does a massive area effect damage on other players ships/drones. This will force people to spread out and make it more difficult to succesfully blob someone.
6. A fee to set corporations/alliances standings. This is a wonderfull idea. Hell we have to pay to declare war, lets pay to declare hostilities/friendship.
7. The most important thing is to get the newer players out into 00 to replace all us old dogs that will be leaving the game. This should be ccp's #1 priority after fixing lag.
tldr
|

harry beanbag
Caldari Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.09 22:08:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Straight Chillen Theres alot of pretty good suggestions in this thread, that molded together could make a huge change to 0.0 space.
There are alotta ****ty suggestions in this thread, but to be fair, they're pretty much all form non sov/space holding entities, Go Figure 
its because you have something to lose and you would not sacrafice your own wealth for the betterment of the community as a whole. But thats ok i would have the same thoughts if i was in your position. Try to look at these not as a space holder but a person leaving empire for the first time to 00. This is what is gonna be needed over the coming years as people like us leave the game. The old gaurd should not be the only ones recieving the benefits of 00 and they shouldnt be able to subjugate the newer players.
|

harry beanbag
Caldari Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.12.09 22:28:00 -
[5]
Originally by: blkmajik The problem with trying to charge for or remove standings is that it just encourages people to merge instead of NAP. This makes things more of an old boy's club than it already is. The result would be switching from having huge coalitions, to just having huge alliances where the strongest of the bunch will require the smallest to be absorbed instead of NAP'd. You are treating the symptom, not the cause, and the result will make the situation even worse.
good point.
|
|
|
|